Stand up for UK aid
What difference does it make?
It would be difficult to convince the more-than-one-billion people who have now escaped extreme poverty that ‘nothing has changed’. For example, thanks to UK aid, over the past four years 11 million children have been able to go to school for the first time. More than 62 million people now have access to clean water, better sanitation or improved hygiene conditions. And millions of people have started to earn a living through small businesses and farming projects assisted by UK aid.
It’s a simple fact: UK aid is making a difference to the lives of the world’s poorest people.
If aid is working, why do we need to keep giving it?
Likewise, it would be difficult to convince the 1.2 billion people around the world who still live on less than £1 a day that no more needs to be done. A lot has been achieved: for example, in the past decade, the number of children dying before their fifth birthday has almost halved. But what about the other half? There’s still a lot that needs to be done.
Doesn’t aid money just end up in the pockets of corrupt people?
UK aid programmes are among the most transparent in the world: we are ranked as 4th out of 46 national donor organisations in the global Aid Transparency Index. So the UK is making sure that taxpayers’ money is spent where it’s meant to be spent: on reducing poverty for the world’s poorest people.
What’s more, UK aid is also actively helping to fight challenges such as corruption in countries around the world, by supporting ordinary people living in the poorest countries to hold their governments to account for how they spend money.
What’s so magical about 0.7%?
The 0.7% figure is not an arbitrary number; it is an internationally agreed amount, based on UN calculations of the amounts needed for poor countries to successfully develop, which the UK and other countries committed to over 45 years ago. The UK government commits other spending in line with similar international targets, such as the 2% of GDP spent on defence as agreed within NATO.
Why do we need a law?
Public support over the years has led to cross-party consensus that meeting the 0.7% commitment is both the right thing to do, as well as being in our national interest. Aid can boost economic growth and political stability around the world – and it is surely in our own national interest to live in a more peaceful, stable and prosperous world.
Parliament agreed in 2015 to make 0.7% legally binding to ensure that the UK’s long-term commitment to tackling global poverty could not be undermined by short-term political changes or local political events. And it makes good business sense too. The predictability of aid to poor countries helps doctors, nurses, teachers and other providers of services in those countries to plan their work better, and means that our government can make smarter long-term investments in aid programmes.
Why should we give more than other rich countries?
UK aid policy reflects the view of the majority of UK citizens. The British are a generous people, even in hard times committing to local, national and international charities. Comic Relief raised £73m this year, and whenever a disaster strikes, the British people are incredibly generous with their response.
The UK isn’t the only country to give 0.7% in aid, but it is true that we are the first country in the G7 to do so. But surely this is something to be proud of.
The President of the World Bank said that the UK’s commitment to development raised the estimation of the UK in the eyes of the developing world. We are justly recognised as a leader in international development – a country that keeps its word and follows through on its promises.
Why must we give so much overseas aid when people are living in poverty at home?
7p in every 10 pounds – is it really so much? As a proportion of government spending, the amount we spend on aid is dwarfed by almost everything else. If we are really concerned about tackling poverty in the UK, there is still the other 99.3% of GNI (Gross National Income) to draw on.
No-one is saying that we don’t need to tackle poverty and support people in need at home – we do. But as the 6th richest country in the world, the UK can do both. We have a moral obligation to keep our promises, in bad times as well as good.
Read these blogs by CARE experts for more thoughts on why protecting the UK commitment to 0.7% is so crucial:
- Realistic and achievable: Why the 0.7% figure is so important
- We are at historic levels of global need: and you want to cut aid?
Write to your MP now to protect the UK's aid commitment in their party's manifesto. If you believe that fighting extreme poverty around the world is not only the right thing for the UK to do, but part of what makes you proud of this country, please ask them to:
protect the UK's commitment to spending 0.7% of our national income on helping the poorest around the world in their party's manifesto
back Britain’s global leadership on humanitarian and development issues
fight to keep the aid budget focused on supporting refugees, alleviating poverty, strengthening women’s rights and responding to emergencies and disasters.
Nepal earthquake: One family's story in picturesSunita, Uttam and their family have benefited from a wide range of support from CARE after the earthquake...Analita Garcela, a village leader in the Philippines, explains how CARE helped the village learn how to...